Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Detecting of Proximal Caries in Primary Molars using Pen-type QLF Device

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2021³â 48±Ç 4È£ p.405 ~ 413
Á¶ÇýÁø, ±èÇöÅÂ, ¼ÛÁö¼ö, ½ÅÅÍÀü, ±èÁ¤¿í, Àå±âÅÃ, ±è¿µÀç,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶ÇýÁø ( Cho Hye-Jin ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
±èÇöÅ ( Kim Hyun-Tae ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
¼ÛÁö¼ö ( Song Ji-Soo ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
½ÅÅÍÀü ( Shin Teo-Jeon ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
±èÁ¤¿í ( Kim Jung-Wook ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Àå±âÅà( Jang Ki-Taeg ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry
±è¿µÀç ( Kim Young-Jae ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Pediatric Dentistry

Abstract


The purpose of this in vivo study was to assess the clinical screening performance of a quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) device in detecting proximal caries in primary molars. Fluorescence loss, red autofluorescence and a simplified QLF score for proximal caries (QS-proximal) were evaluated for their validity in detecting proximal caries in primary molars compared to bitewing radiography. Three hundred and forty-four primary molar surfaces were included in the study. Carious lesions were scored according to lesion severity assessed by visual-tactile and radiographic examinations. The QLF images were analyzed for two quantitative parameters, fluorescence loss and red autofluorescence, as well as for QS-proximal. For both quantitative parameters and QS-proximal, the sensitivity, specificity and area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) were calculated as a function of the radiographic scoring index at enamel and dentin caries levels. Both quantitative parameters showed fair AUROC values for detecting dentine level caries (¡âF = 0.794, ¡âR = 0.750). QS-proximal showed higher AUROC values (0.757 - 0.769) than that of visual-tactile scores (0.653) in detecting dentine level caries. The QLF device showed fair screening performance in detecting proximal caries in primary molars compared to bitewing radiography.

Å°¿öµå

Quantitative light-induced fluorescence; Proximal caries; Caries detection

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI